Hedonic wellbeing has subsequently been interpreted as subjective wellbeing ( Deci & Ryan, 2008), while the eudaimonic interpretation is at least partially objective in its conception of wellbeing-it is about one’s meaning and sense of purpose as opposed to positive or negative affect ( Deci & Ryan, 2008). Ryff and Singer see it as a state “of striving toward excellence based on one’s unique potential” (2008, p. Eudaimonia is therefore about self-realization or self-actualization ( Ryff & Singer 2008). Eudaimonia has been interpreted as a deeper state of wellbeing, one in which an individual flourishes. Hedonia is seen as happiness, generally defined as the presence of positive affect and the absence of negative affect ( Deci & Ryan, 2008). The concept of wellbeing is grounded in philosophical distinctions between pleasure (hedonia) and meaning or greater purpose in life (eudaimonia McCabe & Johnson, 2013). There is, however, some broad agreement about tourist wellbeing conceptualization in the tourism literature ( Nawijn & Filep, 2016). It is linked, according to the authors, to questionable, morally laden ideals of the good life and happiness ( Carlisle & Hanlon, 2008). The new affiliation dimension now includes both social connections and tourists’ connections with the natural environments, thus reframing tourist wellbeing conceptualization beyond human-to-human contact.įor Carlisle & Hanlon (2008) psychological wellbeing is vague and poorly defined. It consists of the following dimensions: detachment-recovery (DR) engagement (E) affiliation (A) meaning (M) and achievement (A). A new conceptual model re-organizing hedonic and eudaimonic dimensions of tourists’ psychological wellbeing is presented for consideration in future research. ![]() Ideas on re-conceptualizing tourist wellbeing are proposed. ![]() Models that summarize these domains seemingly overlap, notably the PERMA and DRAMMA models. While there is agreement that tourist wellbeing is multidimensional in nature, it is unclear what specific dimensions, or psychological domains, underpin tourists’ hedonic and eudaimonic wellbeing. The paper re-examines the conceptualization of psychological tourist wellbeing. Research on tourists’ eudaimonic and hedonic wellbeing has grown exponentially in the tourism literature. ![]() All subjects Allied Health Cardiology & Cardiovascular Medicine Dentistry Emergency Medicine & Critical Care Endocrinology & Metabolism Environmental Science General Medicine Geriatrics Infectious Diseases Medico-legal Neurology Nursing Nutrition Obstetrics & Gynecology Oncology Orthopaedics & Sports Medicine Otolaryngology Palliative Medicine & Chronic Care Pediatrics Pharmacology & Toxicology Psychiatry & Psychology Public Health Pulmonary & Respiratory Medicine Radiology Research Methods & Evaluation Rheumatology Surgery Tropical Medicine Veterinary Medicine Cell Biology Clinical Biochemistry Environmental Science Life Sciences Neuroscience Pharmacology & Toxicology Biomedical Engineering Engineering & Computing Environmental Engineering Materials Science Anthropology & Archaeology Communication & Media Studies Criminology & Criminal Justice Cultural Studies Economics & Development Education Environmental Studies Ethnic Studies Family Studies Gender Studies Geography Gerontology & Aging Group Studies History Information Science Interpersonal Violence Language & Linguistics Law Management & Organization Studies Marketing & Hospitality Music Peace Studies & Conflict Resolution Philosophy Politics & International Relations Psychoanalysis Psychology & Counseling Public Administration Regional Studies Religion Research Methods & Evaluation Science & Society Studies Social Work & Social Policy Sociology Special Education Urban Studies & Planning BROWSE JOURNALS
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |